Terraces near BethlehemIn Part I of this series, we examined the need to view the entire Christmas story arc – which begins in Exodus (after the prologue in Genesis) and ends with John the Baptizer’s declaration of “Behold the Lamb of God”.

Today, I would like to take a quick journey in trying to determine when, during the year, Jesus’ birthday was likely to have fallen. [Hint: For those of you paying attention, it wasn't likely to be December 25.]

Remember, Remember, the 25th of December

There are a number of reasons Christmas is celebrated on December 25, many of which are syncretised from pagan Winter solstice celebrations, most likely those during the time of Constatine, which celebrated the birth of the “gods” Mithra, Ishtar and Julius Caesar. By celebrating the birth of Jesus on this date, many Christians sought to ‘de-paganize’ the celebrations and feasting of this day (or in some traditions, a week or more), and Roman authorities sought to blur the lines between Christianity and Mithraism, the two primary competing religions of the empire.

There is very little doubt that December 25 is not the actual date of Jesus’ birth, but a date chosen for numerous other reasons, lost to antiquity.

Of Shepherds and Fields

One of the first indications of the time of year of Jesus’ birth comes to us from the Gospel of Luke:

And there were shepherds living out in the fields nearby, keeping watch over their flocks at night.

What, you might ask, from this would give us any clue, whatsoever?

In the land of Israel, there are two types of land – wilderness and farmland – which have a fairly distinct border between them. In the Hebrew Scriptures, it is described as a “land flowing with milk and honey”. Milk is the product of sheep , tended by shepherds. Sheep are tended and maintained in the wilderness areas of Israel. Honey, on the other hand, is a word which describes not only bees’ honey, but also the product of mashing fruits, such as figs and dates, which are stored in sealed jars. [A recent excavation near Masada found jars of this 'honey' prepared during the time of Herod the Great, still in edible condition.] Honey is one of the key products, along with grain, of farmers.
The word used by Luke to describe where the shepherds were – in the fields – specifically refers to the fields of the farmers, and not the wilderness area (which he describes via a different word elsewhere). Only two times during the year would sheep be allowed to be in these fields – after the spring harvest after the poor had gleaned the corners (around the time of the Feast of Shavuot (Pentecost)) and after the fall harvest after the poor had gleaned the corners (around the time of the Feast of Sukkot (Tabernacles)). During any other time of the year, shepherds would have been attacked and likely killed for allowing their sheep into the unharvested fields.

Doing the Math

The second method we can use to try to approximate a birth date for Jesus is via gestational math from scriptural clues. From Luke 1:

In the time of Herod king of Judea there was a priest named Zechariah, who belonged to the priestly division of Abijah;

[...]

When his time of service was completed, he returned home. After this his wife Elizabeth became pregnant

From historical Jewish records, we can place the time of service for the division of Abijah in the late spring of the year, ending in early June. So, if we assume that soon after this (as the Greek text seems to indicate) Elizabeth became pregnant, she would have known this in early July.

Luke continues:

In the sixth month, God sent the angel Gabriel to Nazareth, a town in Galilee, to a virgin pledged to be married to a man named Joseph, a descendant of David. The virgin’s name was Mary. The angel went to her and said, “Greetings, you who are highly favored! The Lord is with you.”

[...]

At that time Mary got ready and hurried to a town in the hill country of Judea, where she entered Zechariah’s home and greeted Elizabeth. When Elizabeth heard Mary’s greeting, the baby leaped in her womb, and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit. In a loud voice she exclaimed: “Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the child you will bear! But why am I so favored, that the mother of my Lord should come to me? As soon as the sound of your greeting reached my ears, the baby in my womb leaped for joy. Blessed is she who has believed that what the Lord has said to her will be accomplished!”

So, we have Mary visiting Elizabeth in what is likely to be early January (Elizabeth’s sixth month), and John leaping in the womb in response to the fetal Jesus in Mary. With this in mind, Jesus’ birth should be approximately nine months later, in early-to-mid September, which is the same time as the Feast of Sukkot – one of the two times of the year in which sheep can be tended by shepherds in the fields.

Linguistic Clues

Next, in beginning of the gospel of John, the most deliberately symbolic of the gospel writers, we are given some linguistic clues as to the time of Christ’s coming.

The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us.

John makes clear that Jesus is the Word, and that he “made his dwelling” among us. However, John’s wording here is peculiar in it choice of words. This can also be translated: “The Word became flesh and tented (or tabernacled) among us”. This word for tent is the same word as is used in the name of the Feast of Sukkot – the Feast of Tabernacles.

Narrative/Poetic Clues

Finally, if we examine the Jewish feasts, and their symbolic significance, we can see a pattern emerge (for those associated with Easter, you can read more in my Holy Week Series from earlier this year):

Holiday Hebrew Meaning Jesus’ Event
Sukkot Celebrating God dwelling among men (originated in the Exodus, where God dwelt among the suka – tents – of his people) Jesus is Born
Passover Celebrating God’s grace; His judgement ‘passing over’ His people, so that they could be redeemed from slavery; The blood of a lamb is shed as a sacrifice for each family to protect the firstborn of each household. Jesus is Crucified
Unleavened Bread All of God’s people praying for Him to give them life (bread) out of the earth. Jesus is in the Tomb
Firstfruits Praising God for granting the first fruits of the barley harvest. These first fruits are the promise that God will grant the remainder of the harvest. Jesus is Resurrected (see I Cor 15)
Shavuot (Pentecost) Celebration of the completion of the spring harvest; God’s giving of the Law to guide His people (3,000 were killed for worshipping the golden calf) The Holy Spirit is given as a guide to God’s people (3,000 were saved that day)

(Note: I’m not including Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, which may be associated with eschatalogical events or (in the case of Rosh Hashanah), with past events linked to partial-preterist eschatology.)

So What?

I have nothing against celebrating God’s gift to man, in Jesus, via the giving of gifts to each other on December 25. I sometimes wonder, though, why Christians fight so hard to prevent the secular world from replacing a religious celebration of a day with a secular celebration of a day on which Christians replaced the original pagan celebration of a day with a religious one (didja follow that?).

It is nice that we give each other gifts on December 25 and celebrate God living amongst us as a Father who gives good gifts. It is kind of weird though to celebrate this as Jesus’ birthday, in which we say ‘Happy Birthday’ and then go into the other room and give each other gifts, instead of him…

Perhaps it’s just time that we celebrate Sukkot as a time when the Word became flesh and tabernacled among us…

  • Share/Bookmark
This entry was posted on Thursday, October 25th, 2007 at 4:29 pm and is filed under Devotional, Original Articles, Theology. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
+/- Collapse/Expand All

17 Comments(+Add)

1   Rick Frueh    http://judahslion.blogspot.com/
October 25th, 2007 at 5:06 pm

Great!

2   Dave    http://blog.thewebsiteguy.com.au
October 25th, 2007 at 5:25 pm

Good Post, those are a lot of my thoughts too except I’m a little more extreme and shun as much as possible from it. Not to the point of being an outcast however. I do the same at Easter.

3   Phil Miller    http://veritasfellowship.blogspot.com
October 25th, 2007 at 6:43 pm

Chris,
As always your work is detailed and interesting.

I’ve been making my way through N.T. Wright’s The New Testament and the People of God, and I saw this little bit of info that might give a little more insight to the selection of December 25.

From p. 58,

The megalomaniac Syrian ruler Antiochus Epiphanes, wanting to use Judea as a buffer state against Egypt, tried to gain Jewish support through usurping the high priest Menelaus. After the Jews, not the least the ousted Jason, had reacted angrily against Menelaus, Antiochus decided (this was not an odd thing to do at that period) to ensure their loyalty by changing the function and direction of their central religious symbol so that it ceased to make them think independently and turned them in the direction of service to himself. He took over the Temple on December 25, 167 BC. Deliberately desecrating it so that Jews would no longer think of it as the place where they were reaffirmed as a unique, he established worship of himself there instead.

Wright describes different groups of Jews reactions to this event.  I won’t type it all up, but basically one group in particular started to gain more popularity among the Jews.  This group thought that God would act to vindicate Himself and His people.

On page 159, Wright says:

People who believe this sort of thing [that God would vindicate His name, His sacred people, and His sacred turf] tend to act with desparate daring. One strand of Jewish self-understanding, belief and hope coalesced into a single movement. Judas Maccabaeus and his companions accomplished the unthinkable, and organized a guerilla revolt that drove out the tyrant. Three years to the day after the Temple’s desecration (December 25, 164 BC) Judas cleansed and reconsecrated it.

When I read he “organized a guerilla revolt and drove out the tyrant”, I literally had to stop and back up. What an awesome description of why Jesus came.

4   Rick Frueh    http://judahslion.blogspot.com/
October 25th, 2007 at 6:48 pm

OK Phil, come down from the clouds and explain yourself to us serfs.

5   Phil Miller    http://veritasfellowship.blogspot.com
October 25th, 2007 at 6:58 pm

Rick,
All I was saying is it’s a neat picture of what Jesus did when He came to earth. Satan, in essence, desecrated God’s creation by tempting Adam and Eve to sin. He took the earth by force, as it were. Jesus’ birth was God’s act of revolt in the cosmic war against the powers that were holding it and its inhabitants captive. Just as the Jewish people were reclaiming the temple, God was reclaiming the earth through sending Jesus.

I just thought it was interesting that December 25 was the date that the Maccabaen revolt cleansed the temple. This may or may not actually be of significance to December 25 being chosen as the day Christmas is celebrated. I haven’t really tried to validate it. I just found it a neat fact.

6   Phil Miller    http://veritasfellowship.blogspot.com
October 25th, 2007 at 7:04 pm

I would also add that Wright’s description of the tyrant being overthrown made me think of this verse:

Colossians 2:15

And having disarmed the powers and authorities, he made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them by the cross

7   Rick Frueh    http://judahslion.blogspot.com/
October 25th, 2007 at 7:11 pm

I embrace the different descriptions and revelations concerning the ministry of Christ and the cross, however they all must be wrapped solidly around the redemptive view of the Passover Lamb. God’s victory was inherant in the forgiving essence of the shed blood of God, and it is worth constant remembrance that God’s victory gained through death.

Wow, death, our enemy, becomes our life through Him.

Halleluiah!

8   Phil Miller    http://veritasfellowship.blogspot.com
October 25th, 2007 at 7:18 pm

Rick,
Yes, that is primary thing to remember. There is no victory without Jesus’ death. In one sense, in God’s economy true victory only comes through losing.

9   Chris P.    
October 25th, 2007 at 7:58 pm

Christmas comes from Constantine’s real religion, i.e. the worship of “sol invictus”, the invincble sun.

I do not celebrate any holidays be they secular, or christian or jewish. All are a waste of time and money,

There is no victory without the death and “resurrection”
If He did not rise, His death means nothing.
Paul went out of his way to stress the risen Christ throughout his letters.

Romans 1:
1Paul, a servant of Christ Jesus, called to be an apostle, set apart for the gospel of God, 2which he promised beforehand through his prophets in the holy Scriptures, 3concerning his Son, who was descended from David according to the flesh 4and was declared to be the Son of God in power according to the Spirit of holiness by his resurrection from the dead, Jesus Christ our Lord, 5through whom we have received grace and apostleship to bring about the obedience of faith for the sake of his name among all the nations, 6including you who are called to belong to Jesus Christ,

Sounds like he believed in predestination also.

10   Phil Miller    http://veritasfellowship.blogspot.com
October 25th, 2007 at 8:17 pm

Chris P.,
Who said anything about Jesus not rising?

I don’t see what your comment has to do with the content of the post, other than the fact that you’ve told us you don’t celebrate Christmas.

11   Tim Reed    http://churchvoices.com
October 25th, 2007 at 8:24 pm

Gee, a calvinist concluding Paul believe in predestination. Shocking. What next? An Arminian concluding Paul believes in free will?

12   Rick Frueh    http://judahslion.blogspot.com/
October 25th, 2007 at 8:53 pm

Aside from the predestination comment (except in a free will context), I admire your stand, Chris. I have no great fondness for holidays myself.

13   Tim Reed    http://churchvoices.com
October 25th, 2007 at 9:09 pm

Not me, I will gladly celebrate holidays. Especially those that bring my far-flung family together, and combines with it the joy of giving gifts. Oh and excellent food.

I guess I’m just a sucker for enjoying the temporal gifts God has given me.

14   Rick Frueh    http://judahslion.blogspot.com/
October 25th, 2007 at 9:10 pm

Don’t worry, Tim, I am a compromiser.

15   Tim Reed    http://churchvoices.com
October 25th, 2007 at 9:11 pm

I’ve always admired that about you.

16   iggy    http://wordofmouthministries.blogspot.com/
October 25th, 2007 at 10:58 pm

Chris P,

Sounds like he believed in predestination also.

There you go again making this a Calvinist “thing”… LOL!

The silly thing about your statement is that Arminians also beleive in predestination… that was not disagreement between the two views… the major disagreement was in that area of free will..

But mostly I wanted to note that YOU BROUGHT UP a Calvinistic argument that was not even present until you came and did the drive-by comment thing you do.

Now, there is a thing you seem to miss… Jesus had to be born and live before he was to die “at the appointed time” and then rise from the grave… so it seems you have only part of the gospel… again.

be blessed,
iggy

17   Phil Miller    http://veritasfellowship.blogspot.com
October 26th, 2007 at 10:14 am

I have never understood the logic of Christians who take the stance that the celebration of holidays (or ‘holy days’ from the word’s roots) is a bad thing. God basically commanded Israel in the OT to set aside certain times of year as celebration. Jesus’ first miracle was at a Jewish wedding, which was a much bigger celebration than our modern-day weddings are for the most part. God certainly is not against people celebrating.

I can understand standing against the commercialization aspects of holidays. Certainly the greed and materialism is not pleasing to God. Celebrating through food, music, and getting together with family, on the other hand, is something that I think still brings glory to God.

By the way, I’m in not advocating Christians celebrate the various Jewish festivals or anything. I think there is freedom on both sides of the issue. I just don’t see anything wrong with Christians celebrating whatever holidays they see fit to.