OK, I have a confession to make.  This confession will probably make some of you question my judgement, or possibly even my salvation.  But here goes.  I absolutely love the NPR program This American Life.  I have over 80 episodes on my Ipod, and I’m addicted to it.  I know that the all of the producers, interviewers, and reporters are bleeding-hearts liberals, but I still find the show funny, witty, and overall well-produced.

One episode that keeps on popping into my head as of late is one entitled, A Little Bit of Knowledge.  In the beginning of that episode, the host, Ira Glass has a conversation with Nancy Updike, a producer, about a time when she was in Europe with some of her friends.  She explains it like this:

A couple of years ago some friends were travelling through Europe, walking through these old buildings. And these people do not know anything special about architecture, but, you know how it is when you’re a tourist. So they’re walking through these buildings and they’re looking at these doorways and pillars and they decide that this one building has a very Moorish influence. They’re pointing out details, saying ‘the Moors this’ and ‘the Moors that’. And finally one of them turns to the other and says, “You know, we sound like we’re in a magazine. A magazine called ‘Modern Jackass’.”

So the basic concept behind being a “Modern Jackass” is that you know enough about a subject to talk somewhat intelligently about it, but there are parts that are just beyond your grasp of understanding, so you kind of just make up the rest.  Thus entering “Modern Jackass” territory.

I’ve noticed this quite a bit this past political season.  I think we’re all guilty of it to some extent.  I think the fact that so much information is available at our fingertips through the wonder of Google and Wikipedia just makes it so very easy to make it look like you know more than you do.  So perhaps, we all need to take a step back now that election is over, take a deep breath, and start peeling away the layers of informational defenses we have put up.  In the end, no one really believes us most of time anyway.

I admit that I have done this.  I have been guilty of braying the loudest sometimes.  I have been guilty of caring more about being right than actually showing love to me ideological opponents.  I, sadly, have been a Modern Jackass.

So as we move forward, let’s remember that not everything on the internet is true, and that there’s nothing wrong with saying those three little words – “I don’t know”.

Grace and peace.

  • Share/Bookmark
This entry was posted on Friday, November 7th, 2008 at 1:04 pm and is filed under Blogging, In Tone and Character, Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
+/- Collapse/Expand All

9 Comments(+Add)

1   Chris P.    
November 7th, 2008 at 4:44 pm

This is the latest post of many found here calling on us to lay down our arms and “just get along. ”

How does loving my enemy/opponent translate into we’re all stupid/wrong/sinful etc so none of us know anything to be true or are able to speak truth?

Who cares if any believe us or not?
Give the message,speak the Word, we are not responsible for the results, unless of course you think your relationship with, or your good works for, will save others.
1 Cor 3:5-7

“I, sadly, have been a Modern Jackass.”

No argument there.

2   Phil Miller    http://pmwords.blogspot.com
November 7th, 2008 at 5:25 pm

How does loving my enemy/opponent translate into we’re all stupid/wrong/sinful etc so none of us know anything to be true or are able to speak truth?

Well that’s not anything close to what I said, really. The fact that you interpreted that way say quite a bit really.

All I said is that we all have the tendency to present ourselves as experts in areas where we really have limited knowledge in, especially on discussions on blogs.

But, hey, you seem to be all-knowing, so I’m sure being anything close to humble is just below you.

3   Aaron    
November 7th, 2008 at 7:22 pm

Who cares if any believe us or not?

And therein lies where you fail in your ministry if this is how you feel in your heart regarding salvation. Do you truly feel nothing or apathy if someone rejects the Word? Do you not try to chase them? Continue to help them, seek them, make them understand in their terms? I’m not suggesting changing the Gospel (as you think so many people do) but rather simply trying to convey and reconvey the Word until they get it.

I’m sorry but if you think that simply speaking the Word and letting the chips fall where they may is enough, then you, sir, are a horrible pastor. We are not responsible for someone else’s salvation, but we are responsible to care for them, regardless of their state.

4   corey    
November 7th, 2008 at 7:46 pm

Wow, Aaron. I don’t think he said anything about salvation or any core doctrines or anything like that. He was mainly talking about politics. To play the “you are a horrible pastor” card seems a little extreme.

(By the way Phil…I heard part of that episode. It was hilarious. Unfortunately, anyone who hears it probably identifies thrmselves in it.)

5   corey    
November 7th, 2008 at 7:50 pm

Reading For Content: an (apparently) optional skill that most 2nd graders pick up

6   Chris L    http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/
November 7th, 2008 at 8:00 pm

Corey – I think Aaron was referring to Chris P’s comment, not Phil’s article…

7   corey    
November 7th, 2008 at 8:04 pm

Lol…that’s me…reading for content…

8   Aaron    
November 7th, 2008 at 11:36 pm

Corey,

lol, yes, my comment was for Chris P’s remarks, not the OP. :)

Regarding my “horrible Pastor” statement, I still stand by it, though I cringe slightly at its roughness, but perhaps it is a needed roughness. If a Pastor felt they could/should simply speak the Word and expect the Holy Spirit to do the rest while leaving the Pastor to assemble his next sermon, I would sincerely be concerned for, if not flatout doubt, the Pastor’s call to ministry.

Does that seem faulty to anyone or am I onto something here?

9   kenn    
November 9th, 2008 at 3:33 pm

Phil,

I agree with you regarding This American Life. Its always a fascinating, well produced hour of radio.

I just enjoy it for what it is. I don’t get too bogged down wih the subtext of Ira’s philosophical points of view. I wouldn’t stop using a Mac because of Steve Job’s ideologies, or the ideologies of the people that make my clothes, build my cars, etc.

I’m not referring to your post here, I think it was very insightful, but in reading the comments, I’m always struck by how complicated some people make religion.

Was it always like this, or is this another internet phenomenon.

What comes to mind is the old minutae cliche of how many fairies can dance on the head of a pin.